Observing the practical shift of national supervision power at the grassroots level from the county level, and exploring the tension between national power supervision and the response of the county system. Based on the case experience of T County, an analysis is conducted around the correlation between county supervision mechanism and governance mechanism. It is found that, on the basis of complying with national supervision discourse, the main functions of county supervision power are expanded, supervision cooperation is embedded, and supervision results are diversified, which is the reconstruction and optimization of the county system on the grassroots supervision system; Relying on institutional authority, the focus of supervision has expanded from the party's discipline and special responsibilities to the central work responsibility of county-level generalization, and highlighted the supervision of power subjects in the process of policy implementation. The practice of supervisory power has been highlighted in the operation of the county-level system, which means that the county-level system has expanded the connotation of grassroots supervisory power while following the national political discourse. By relying on differentiated and integrated supervisory mechanisms, grassroots supervision has become normalized and procedural, and county-level governance has shown a trend of "governance through supervision".

从县域可观察国家监督权力在基层的实践性转向,并探究国家权力监督与县域体制回应之间的张力。在T县个案经验基础上,围绕县域监督机制与治理机制的关联性展开分析,研究发现:在遵从国家监督话语的基础上,县域监督权力实现主体功能拓展、监督协作互嵌和监督结果运用多样化等特征,是县域体制对基层监督体系的再构与优化;依托于体制权威,监督注意力从党的纪律、专项事责拓展到县域泛化的中心工作责任,并突出政策执行过程中的权力主体监督。监督权实践在县域体制运行过程中凸显出来,这意味着县域体制在遵循国家政治话语的前提下拓展了基层监督权力的内涵,并依靠差异化和融合式监督机制使基层监督常态化、程序化,县域治理呈现出 “通过监督进行治理”趋向。