公共管理与政策评论 ›› 2017, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 19-32.

• 社会治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国区域创新体系的治理测度及其与经济发展关系研究

  

  • 出版日期:2017-06-20 发布日期:2017-02-25

  • Online:2017-06-20 Published:2017-02-25

摘要:

通过对国内外区域创新体系建设及治理100余篇的文献研究,根据创新体系治理的内
涵,并在相关理论的支撑下,以6个维度49项指标构建了我国区域创新体系治理指数的评价指标
体系,运用VIKOR 法对我国2014年区域创新治理指数进行了测度和分析; 同时, 对我国区域
2011—2014年创新治理指数及治理维度得分与区域经济发展及产业结构分别构建回归模型进行研
究。研究得出:区域创新体系的治理发展不平衡,两极分化较为明显;创新体系的治理维度发展不
均衡且与治理指数呈现非同步性特征;剔除“三驾马车”效应后,区域创新体系的治理对经济发展
具有显著的正向驱动作用,且滞后2年的效果最为显著;区域创新体系的多个治理维度对产业结构
的发展具有显著的正向作用,创新平台促进和创新引导对产业发展不具有直接的正向作用。

关键词: 区域创新体系, 创新治理, 治理评价, 经济发展, 回归模型

Abstract:

This paper establishes evaluation indexes system which contain 6 dimensions and 49 indicators on governance of regional innovation system based on its connotation, public governance theories and research in more than 100 references, and then measures and analyzes the regional innovation governance index in the year 2014 by VIKOR method. Meanwhile, the paper studies the relationship between governance of innovation system and economic development, and also its governance dimensions and industrial structure development through the regression model in years 2011-2014. The results show that the governance development of regional innovation system are not balanced, where existed two more obvious differentiation. Secondly its dimensions development are not balanced and shows a non-synchronous character accompanied the governance index of innovation system. Again, the governance of regional innovation system has significant positive driving effect on economic development after eliminating the "three carriages" effect and the most significant effect in the 2 year lagging. Moreover, multiple governance dimensions of regional innovation system have significant positive effect on the development of industrial structure, however, one governance dimension does not have a direct positive effect. Lastly, the paper puts forward policy suggestions.

Key words: