公共管理与政策评论 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 138-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

新安全格局背景下城市安全韧性评价框架: 探索与构建

  

  • 出版日期:2024-05-17 发布日期:2024-05-06

An Evaluation Framework for Urban Safety Resilience in the Context of New Security Pattern: Exploration and Construction#br#

  • Online:2024-05-17 Published:2024-05-06

摘要:

安全韧性城市作为城市发展的新范式,是加快推进国家安全体系和能力现代化进程的重要动态场域。在 “以新安全格局保障新发展格局”的战略指导下,城市安全韧性评价的实践需求日益迫切。然而,国内已有的城市韧性与城市安全韧性评价体系因理论研究相对不足、指标设计与实际贴合度偏低等原因而无法满足当前城市安全韧性评价的需求。鉴于此,本文立足新发展阶段,开创性提出三维韧性视角,并构建出具有前瞻性、指导性和方向性的城市安全韧性评价框架,强调评价结构性韧性应重点关注党委集中统一领导体制、多元主体协同治理体制与相关制度体系;评价功能性韧性应重点关注城市发展与安全统筹机制、工程项目与非工程措施整合机制、常态治理与非常态应急转换机制、信息纠偏与组织学习机制等;评价保障性韧性应重点关注资源配置优化、数字技术赋能和法治规约支撑。这一框架意在为安全韧性城市评价提供学理依据和管理工具,有助于筑牢高质量发展的安全基石,实现经济社会的安全发展、转型发展。

关键词: 城市安全韧性, 评价框架, 结构性韧性, 功能性韧性, 保障性韧性

Abstract:

As a new paradigm of urban development, safety resilient city is an important dynamic field to accelerate the modernization of China's system and capacity for security. Under the strategic guidance of "ensuring a new development pattern with a new security pattern", the practical demand for evaluating urban safety resilience is becoming increasingly urgent. However, the existing evaluation systems for urban resilience and urban safety resilience in China cannot meet the current needs for evaluating urban safety resilience due to relatively insufficient theoretical research and low fit between indicator design and actual conditions. Based on the new development stage, this paper proposes a three-dimensional resilience perspective and constructs a forward-looking, guiding, and directional evaluation framework for urban safety resilience. It emphasizes that the evaluation of structural resilience should focus on the system of centralized and unified leadership of the CPC and the system of multi-subject collaborative governance; the evaluation of functional resilience should focus on mechanisms of coordinating development and security, integration of engineering projects and non-engineering measures, conversion from conventional governance to emergency management, informational correction and organizational learning; the evaluation of guaranteed resilience should focus on the optimization of resource allocation, the empowerment of digital technology and the guarantee of law regulations. This framework is intended to provide theoretical bases and management tools for the evaluation of safety resilient city, which is conducive to the security for high-quality development and achieve the safety and transformation of economic and social development.

Key words: